Legal Opinion

People v. Rosa

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1996No. 94CA0599PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROY.

Defendant, Carl D. Rosa, appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding him guilty of theft, attempted theft, and criminal impersonation. We affirm and remand with instructions to correct the mittimus.

Defendant’s convictions arose from the theft of a ring from a Colorado Springs jeweler and the attempted theft of a ring from another Colorado Springs jeweler.

On April 1, 1992, defendant purchased a cubic zirconia ring that met his detailed specifications, paying $200 for it.

On April 2, 1992, a man switched a cubic zirconia ring with a similar…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kogan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. PriceColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. KruegerColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. People v. GrossColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Margenau v. BowlinColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. People v. ThorntonColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API