Legal Opinion

State v. O'MEARA

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2000No. CR-99-0226-PRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTONE, Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review to resolve a conflict between Division One and Division Two of the Court of Appeals on the approach taken to evaluate the “totality of the circumstances” surrounding reasonable suspicion to support a detention.

I

¶2 Detective Jesus Lopez saw four men loitering in front of a K-Mart in Tucson. They then got into a maroon car and sat for about fifteen minutes. One of them got out of the car, walked towards the front of the K-Mart, and talked to O’Meara for a few minutes. The other three men got out of the maroon car and into a gray car parked nearby.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. State v. MagnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. State v. O'MEARACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. TeagleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. State of Arizona v. Nelson Ivan Boteo-FloresArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State of Arizona v. William Peter MoranCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API