Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Ditton

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2006No. 04-434PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Warner

¶1 Michael H. Ditton (Ditton), appearing pro se, appeals from an order of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, affirming his conviction for driving under the influence (DUI) in Bozeman Municipal Court. We affirm.

¶2 We restate and address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Must the complaint against Ditton be dismissed because the Municipal Court did not timely determine that there was probable cause to file the charge?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in affirming the Municipal Court’s decisions regarding the exclusion of evidence obtained during pretrial incarceration,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. SiegalMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. City of Billings v. BruceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. BonamarteMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. Bryan LemayMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. DoyleMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. City of Billings v. MouatMontana Supreme Court · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API