Legal Opinion
State v. Malott
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 21, 1992No. 792PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
Appellant, state of Ohio, takes this appeal, pursuant to R.C. 2945.67 and Crim.R. 12(J), from a judgment of the Hillsboro Municipal Court granting appellee’s, Raymond L. Malott’s, motion to suppress evidence. 1 The appellant raises the following assignments of error:
“I. The trial court abused its descretion [sic] by refusing to allow the prosecutor to consult with the arresting officer prior to the state presenting its case and refusing to allow the state to examine after the court called the arresting officer as its own witness.
“II. The trial court erred in finding that the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Xenia v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Dayton v. DabneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1994