Legal Opinion

Miller v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1904PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Levy and claim. Before Judge Cann. Chatham superior court. February 6, 1904.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

A mortgage execution in favor of Brooks, as administrator of Mousseau, against the executors of the will of A. J. Miller, and the western half of lot number 37 Jackson ward and improvements in the City of Savannah, Georgia, was levied upon the property described therein, and a claim was interposed by G. H. Miller. The case was tried before Judge. Barrow, and resulted in a verdict finding the property subject. Judge Barrow having died on the day that the verdict was rendered, a motion for a new trial was made before his successor, Judge Cann, who refused to set aside the verdict. The claimant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ronkendorff v. Taylor's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Burns v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Ansley v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  4. Moale v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  5. Wheeler v. AnthonyNew York Supreme Court · 1833

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jones v. Bibb Brick Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. St. Charles Savings Bank v. DenkeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  3. Bowers v. DolanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Muskogee Refining Co. v. Waters Pierce Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Quarterman v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API