Hutton v. Martin
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.
By this garnishment proceeding, plaintiff seeks to compel defendant city’s insurer to pay a judgment for the wrongful death of her husband, under the terms of a public liability indemnity policy.
The fatal accident occurred October 14, 1949, at two o’clock in the afternoon. Defendant city was then insured under an indemnity policy issued by the garnishee defendant. This policy expired October 15, 1949, at 12:01 a. m. It contained the following provisions:
“3. Limits of Liability. (No insurance is afforded under any Insuring Agreement unless specific limits of liability as to such Insuring…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Boyd v. SiboldWashington Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by16 opinions
- Burris v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Exch.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Davis v. FoleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Lepic Ex Rel. Lepic v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Daley v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.