Legal Opinion

Hutton v. Martin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1953No. 32162PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

By this garnishment proceeding, plaintiff seeks to compel defendant city’s insurer to pay a judgment for the wrongful death of her husband, under the terms of a public liability indemnity policy.

The fatal accident occurred October 14, 1949, at two o’clock in the afternoon. Defendant city was then insured under an indemnity policy issued by the garnishee defendant. This policy expired October 15, 1949, at 12:01 a. m. It contained the following provisions:

“3. Limits of Liability. (No insurance is afforded under any Insuring Agreement unless specific limits of liability as to such Insuring…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Boyd v. SiboldWashington Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burris v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Campbell v. Farmers Ins. Exch.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Davis v. FoleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Lepic Ex Rel. Lepic v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  5. Daley v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API