Legal Opinion

People v. Beaudin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1983No. Docket 68199PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

We are asked to decide whether the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury regarding specific intent1 in the case of a defendant charged with endangering the lives of persons traveling on a railroad.2 We hold that the instruction should have been given.

*572I

The defendant and another man were accused of endangering lives by removing four bolts from a section of railroad track near Ubly, Michigan, on May 6, 1978. The accomplice was granted immunity and testified against the defendant at a jury trial in the Huron Circuit Court. According to the witness, he came upon a loose bolt and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LangworthyMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. PetheramMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People v. DunkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. People v. BeaudinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. NowackMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. KowalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. LardieMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. GouldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. King v. Nash (In Re Estate of Erwin)Michigan Supreme Court · 2018

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API