Legal Opinion
Megarry Bros. v. City of St. Thomas
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1954No. 7444PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Justice.
Because of the unusual situation presented by this appeal we deem it necessary to set out the pleadings at some length. The plaintiff alleges in the complaint
2
“That the City of Saint Thomas is a Municipal Corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of North Dakota.
3
“That between the fifteenth day of June, 1948, and the first day of January, 1949, the Plaintiff furnished material and equipment and furnished machinery and labor for the construction of paving in the City of Saint Thomas of the agreed value as follows:
Excavation, street…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mitchell v. AllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Cleveringa v. KleinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Schmidt v. WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Crichfield v. Bermudez Asphalt Paving Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Soo Line Railroad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Le Pire v. Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Roeders v. City of Washburn Ex Rel. City CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Parker Hotel Company v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Marshfield Homes, Inc. v. EichmeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.