Legal Opinion
Kuder v. Sawyer
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 2, 1959PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
That part of the order appealed from, which directs that $83.75 of bond interest be allocated to principal in order to amortize the premium paid above par in the purchase of the bonds, is in favor of the remaindermen beneficiaries and against the interests of the life beneficiary. Therefore, the guardian ad litem is not a “party aggrieved” by such portion of the order, and cannot appeal therefrom. Sec. 274.10, Stats., and Estate of Bryngelson (1941), 237 Wis. 7, 11, 296 N. W. 63.
We deem that the only remaining issue before this court is whether sec. 231.40 (12), Stats., which makes…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Tidal Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Crawford EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Catherwood TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Norvell EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Nowicki v. UllsvikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- State v. RivensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Gallagher v. ScherneckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.