Legal Opinion
Piekarski v. Home Owners Savings Bank, F.S.B.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 30, 1991No. Civ. No. 4-90-661PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVITT, District Judge.
Introduction
The damages phase of this wrongful termination from employment action was tried to the court over three days commencing November 5, 1990. On December 6, 1990, the court issued its findings and order on damages, concluding that plaintiff was entitled to receive $155,000.00 as compensatory and $25,000.00 as punitive damages from defendants.1
*861This matter is presently before the court upon plaintiffs motion for an award of $215,535.07 in attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 181.935(a).2 For the reasons set forth below, the court awards…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- 28 Fair empl.prac.cas. 19, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,459 Alta Chrapliwy, and Cross-Appellees v. Uniroyal, Inc., a Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baufield v. Safelite Glass Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Piekarski v. Home Owners Sav. Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991