Griffin v. Pate
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
COYTE, Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the judgment dismissing their complaint against defendants. We affirm.
Plaintiffs filed suit against defendants alleging that plaintiffs were physically assaulted and harassed by defendants. The amended complaint consisted of two causes of action. There was no designation of separate causes of action in assault and battery, negligence, trespass, violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, nor claim for outrageous conduct, but plaintiffs nevertheless argue that they have alleged such claims and that the evidence ran to such claims.
In their answer defendants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. HopperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Espinoza v. O'DELLSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Cox v. Pearl Investment CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- Shakespeare v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1966
- Blackwell v. Del BoscoColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. MalczewskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Alley v. Gubser Development Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983
- City of Aurora v. Commerce Group Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1984