Legal Opinion
Shakespeare v. Wilson
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 18, 1966No. 65-637-IHPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
IRVING HILL, District Judge.
By separate Order and judgment entered this day, I have dismissed the above-entitled action with prejudice. The dismissal is based on the following two grounds:
1. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is not a short, plain statement, nor is each averment in that pleading simple, concise and direct as required by Rules 8(a) (2), (e) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See discussion at 1(A) which follows.) In further support of dismissal for violation of Rule 8, I find that Plaintiff makes no statement showing that she is entitled to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Collins v. HardymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Kelley v. BoettcherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- R. W. Agnew v. Richard W. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Robert E. Sykes v. State of California (Department of Motor Vehicles)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Lucille C. Place v. Mrs. Mary C. ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Collins v. WomancareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Collins v. WomancareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Morpurgo v. Bd. of Higher Ed. in City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.