Legal Opinion

State v. Mack

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1981No. 8126SC102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Defendant brings forth four assignments of error on appeal. We have considered each and find the fourth assignment to be dispositive.

After having begun their deliberations, the jury returned to the courtroom and informed the court that it had not reached a verdict. Thereupon, the court said:

[N]ow ladies and gentlemen, the Court, as I have previously instructed you, is certainly not putting any pressure on you *128to change your minds, or to reach a verdict in this case. I would remind you, however, that if you do not decide this case, that twelve more jurors will have to decide it at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. DardenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BurroughsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API