Legal Opinion

State v. Darden

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1980No. 808SC121PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is the trial court’s sustaining objections by the state to certain evidence offered by defendant and allowing the state’s motion to strike certain evidence. On direct examination of defendant, he testified as follows:

When I saw him [John Smith] about ten o’clock at Hollo-man’s Store, we just looked at each other, me and John. We don’t get along too good. He said something like, you know, well it won’t much. I don’t recall what it was he said; it won’t nothing; see, we don’t get along; so we don’t speak; we got reasons for not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ReplogleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. State v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. PhillpottCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API