Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1986No. 8526SC877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

In his first assignment of error, defendant contends the trial court erred during the charge to the jury by commenting on the effect of the failure of the jury to reach a verdict. We agree.

The jury in this case began deliberations at approximately 2:54 p.m. At approximately 5:35 p.m., the jury sent a note to the court which stated: “The jury is not able to reach a verdict. . . . The jury feels you should know that the vote is [e]leven to one [gjuilty as charged. [0]nly [t]en of us think you should know this.” The jury thereafter returned to the jury box, and the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. LipfirdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. MackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BurroughsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. BuckomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API