Legal Opinion

Alder v. City of Florence

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1964No. 43,861PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an injunction action wherein appeal has been duly perfected from an order of the trial court in ancillary proceedings designed to determine damages embraced within an injunction bond because the plaintiffs below wrongfully obtained the issuance of a restraining order against the city of Florence, Kansas.

The primary thrust of this appeal is to determine the nature of proceedings on an injunction bond.

On the 30th day of January, 1963, Mary A. Alder, John J. Alder and Harry H. Alder (plaintiffs-appellants) filed a petition in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. GreeningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Underhill v. SpencerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  4. Baker v. CraigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Row v. ArtzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Idbeis v. Wichita Surgical Specialists, P.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. DeWerff v. SchartzCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Schmidt v. NyeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
  4. State ex rel. Schmidt v. NyeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API