Legal Opinion

DeWerff v. Schartz

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 17, 1988No. 59,644PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Six, J.:

Plaintiffs Vernon and Marian DeWerff appeal from the trial court’s denial of their request for an injunction to enjoin defendants Dale Schartz and Joseph Schermuly from pumping water from the Schermuly farmland. The DeWerffs also appeal the trial court’s award of damages to Dale Schartz and Schermuly based upon the wrongful issuance of a temporary restraining order.

LeRoy Schartz, originally named as a party defendant in this action, was dismissed at the pretrial conference.

The issues are: (1) Did the trial court err in allowing defendants Schermuly and Schartz to continue to pump…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nelson v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Secretary of the Kansas Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Hagedorn Ex Rel. Hagedorn v. Stormont-Vail Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Lantz v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Unified School District No. 503 v. McKinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Williamson v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Fischer v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. In re the Estate of ClineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. In re J.W.S.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API