Legal Opinion
Benaman v. Andrews
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 20, 2007No. CCV0106315, A129153PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Respondent appeals a limited judgment of the Clackamas County Circuit Court denying her motion to vacate or modify a June 2001 permanent stalking protective order (SPO) issued pursuant to ORS 163.735, as well as two supplemental judgments awarding attorney fees to petitioner under ORS 20.105(1) based on the court’s determination that respondent’s efforts to have the SPO set aside were not objectively reasonable. We review de novo, Hanzo v. deParrie, 152 Or App 525, 953 P2d 1130 (1998), rev den, 328 Or 418 (1999); Boyd v. Essin, 170 Or App 509, 12 P3d 1003 (2000), rev den, 331 Or 674 (2001),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Boyd v. EssinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Secor Investments, LLC v. AndereggCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Estate of Krueger v. RoppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. G. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Williams v. SALEM WOMEN'S CLINICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Olson v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. T. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Hunt v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Carter v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.