Legal Opinion

Carter v. Bowman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 2, 2012No. 060303051; A143679PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

In 2006, petitioner obtained a stalking protective order (SPO) against respondent. In 2009, respondent moved to terminate the SPO and, after a hearing, the trial court terminated it. Petitioner appeals the judgment terminating the SPO, arguing, inter alia, that the court erred in failing to consider statements that respondent had posted on the Internet. We conclude that the court erred in failing to consider the Internet postings. Therefore, we reverse and remand.

In August 2009, at the hearing on respondent’s motion to terminate the SPO, petitioner introduced numerous documents, including two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Habrat v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Travis v. StrubelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Benaman v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Edwards v. BiehlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miley v. MileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. M. D. O. v. DesantisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. J. S. E. v. CubicCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. P. O. B. v. HarnyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API