Legal Opinion

(PC) Faultry v. Saechao

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 15, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01850Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES FAULTRY, No. 2:18-cv-1850 KJM AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 J. SAECHAO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights 19 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case arises from events at California State Prison 20 Sacramento (CSP-SAC), and proceeds on plaintiff’s claims of excessive force and conspiracy 21 against defendant correctional officers Saechao and Shirley;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API