Legal Opinion

State v. Trujillo

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1998No. 18,283PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTZ, Chief Judge.

{1} Absent an emergency clause, a law passed by the New Mexico Legislature ordinarily does not go into effect until at least ninety days after its passage. See N.M. Const, art. IV, § 23. The obvious purpose of the delay is to provide time for those affected by the law to receive notice and make any necessary adjustments. Sometimes, however, the necessary adjustments are not accomplished within the allotted time. In the case before us, the State prosecuted an alleged incident of domestic violence in a manner that would have been appropriate a few weeks earlier; but…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BlevinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bettini v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. YarboroughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. RileyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. State v. WessonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. FosterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Janet v. MarshallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. HeinsenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. BellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API