Legal Opinion

McGhee Cotton Co. v. Herrine

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1912No. 3773PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action on contract; from city court of Cartersville — Judge Foute.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

Suit was brought for damages for the alleged failure to deliver cotton according to the terms of a writing of which the following is a copy: “I have this day sold to McGhee Cotton Co., Rome, Ga., four (4) B/C average r’s & 6’s at 12 c per same to be delivered at McGhee Cotton Co. Warehouse, Rome, Ga., on or before November 10th, 1909, weight of cotton to be 450 to 500 # per bale.” This writing was signed by Herrine. At the bottom of the writing appeared the word “Accepted,” followed by the signature of the McGhee Cotton Company. The petition alleged the market value of the cotton at the time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Luke v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  2. Mallet v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Terry v. International Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mendel v. Converse & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Matthews v. American Textile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Meader v. Incorporated Town of SibleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Columbus Bagging & Tie Co. v. Empire Mills Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  5. Howel v. KinneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API