Legal Opinion
Mendel v. Converse & Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 27, 1923No. 14123PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBelt., J.
The petition in this case was founded upon the theory of an anticipatory breach of an alleged written contract for purchase of goods, the vendor seeking to recover as damages the difference between the contract price and the market price at the time and place for delivery. General and special demurrers to the petition were overruled, and demurrers to certain parts of the answer were sustained. Only the plea of non est factum was allowed to remain. The plaintiff recovered, and the defendant excepted to the rulings upon the demurrers and to the denial of his motion for a new trial. Held:
1. “An…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Perdue v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Board of Education v. DaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Gaynok v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Fraser v. JarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Harris v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Aspironal Laboratories Inc. v. RosenblattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Szabo Associates, Inc. v. Peachtree-Piedmont AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Ingram v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Smith v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.