Legal Opinion

Van Buren v. Eberhard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1954No. Appeals, 281 and 282PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Chidsey,

This action of trespass was instituted by Carl Van Burén, the father of the minor plaintiff, in his own right and as guardian for the minor, Bruce VanBuren, *25his four year old son, for injuries to the child, who was struck by an automobile operated by one of the defendants. The motor vehicle was owned by Lewis Eberhard, one of the defendants, but was not being driven by him. Since no agency relationship was established between Eberhard and the other defendants, a directed verdict was returned in his favor, which is not questioned by the plaintiffs. The liability…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. CHAPPLE v. SellersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Wiser v. Parkway Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Lott Et Ux. v. Peoples Nat. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Wilson v. Butler Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rosche v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Gift v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Fries v. RitterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Cason v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Geiger v. SchneyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API