Legal Opinion

Pucek v. Koppa

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 16, 1930No. 961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, C. J.

This suit was instituted by appellant, Firank Pucek, against appellees' William Koppa and Pete Bubella, doing business under the trade-name of Rosebud Mercantile Company, to set aside a judgment theretofore rendered against him in favor of appellees, and to recover the value of property which appellees caused to he seized under process issued on such judgment. Appellant alleged that ap-pellees instituted a suit against him in the justice court upon verified account for the sum of $62.26; that a judgment was rendered therein in favor of appellees; that appellant prosecuted an appeal from said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burt v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  2. Home Ben. Ass'n of Henderson County v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. McCaskill v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Pellum v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Scott v. McGlothlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Zarsky v. MossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Carter v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. Ex Rel. Migura v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Galvan v. City of BrownsvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API