Legal Opinion

Burt v. Clay

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 13, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

D!rury, Commissioner—

AJfirming.

The trial court refused to review the finding made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board, by which the appellee, Harry B. Clay, was awarded compensation at the rate of $12.00 per week for a period of one hundred weeks, for the loss of sight of one eye. Appellant H. J. Burt and appellee Jesse Whiting were both defendants before the Workmen’s Compensation Board. This award was made against both of them, and Burt has appealed.

This ease was heard upon the following stipulated facts:

“It is agreed between the plaintiff and. defendant by counsel…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kelley v. ProutyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Churchwell Bros. v. Archie R. Briggs Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. McDonald v. Treasurer of State of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Pucek v. KoppaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API