Legal Opinion
Southern Surety Co. v. Mobile Nat. Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 15, 1931No. 1 Div. 659PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit was by the assignor of a claim and upon the bond of a contractor of highway construction.
The equitable nature of such a suit by the assignor of contractors and those who furnished labor and material for road construction on state contracts was the subject of decision in United States F. & G. Co. v. Benson Hardware Co., 222 Ala. 429, 132 So. 622; United States F. & G. Co. v. Andalusia Mfg. Co., 222 Ala. 637, 134 So. 18; Sherrill Oil Co. v. Taylor (Ala. Sup.) 137 So. 295; 1 Sherrill Oil Oo. v. Taylor (Ala. Sup.) 137 So. 296. 2 go, also, claims of interveners for work and labor done and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Tatum v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- McWilliams v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Hopkins v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bromberg v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- WB Davis Hosiery Mill, Inc. v. Word Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Lynch v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. SuttlesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934
- Mosteller v. CriderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.