Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 11, 1937No. 4 Div. 988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill sought partition of real property among cotenants by its sale.

A material part of the testimony was taken orally before the circuit court and judge rendering the final decree. It is supported by the intendments that prevail. Hodge v. Joy, 207 Ala. 198, 92 So. 171.

The respective insistences are that the possession of the land by Mrs. Lynch, formerly Mrs. Espy, was in recognition of complainants’ right, title, and interest therein ; the contrary insistence being made that the long holding by Mrs. Espy was not merely permissive, but was open, notorious, and adverse to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Winsett v. WinsettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Tatum v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Williams v. AnthonySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Miller v. Vizzard Investment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bromberg v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Swafford v. BrasherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Marino v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Tate v. Water Works & Sewer Board of OxfordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API