Legal Opinion

Womochil v. Peters

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 4, 1939No. 44590PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSager, J.

Bradley Carlton, one of the defendants, was dismissed during the progress of the trial. Appellants complain of the dismissal but we are unable to see how they were prejudicially affected. Neither Code 1935, section 11182, nor Bruhn v. Fort Dodge St. R. Co., 195 Iowa 454, 192 N. W. 296, supports appellants at this point.

The accident under investigation occurred near midnight of November 29, 1936. At that time plaintiff was riding in a taxicab owned by the defendant Peters, driven by a defendant Augustine, and operated under some agreement with appellant Ethel B. Harte, doing business under the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bridenstine v. Iowa City Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Duncan v. RhombergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Sperry v. Estate of MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Shuck v. KeefeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Carpenter v. WolfeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rozmajzl v. Northland Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. Nehring v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  4. Eno v. Adair County Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Petersen v. Chicago, Great Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API