Legal Opinion

Ethel v. Batchelder

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 10,374PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— Upon the record of this cause the appellant, the defendant below, has assigned errors as follows:

1. In overruling his demurrer to the first paragraph of appellee’s complaint; and,

*5212. In overruling his motion for a new trial.

We will consider and decide the questions presented by these alleged errors in the order of their assignment.

1. In the first paragraph of her complaint the appellee alleged, in substance, that she then was, and for more than ten years last past had been, a married woman; that she then was, and since April 26th, 1863, had been, the owner in fee simple of certain real…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. HoldermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Evansville, Cairo & Memphis Steam Packet Co. v. WildmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Schafer v. State ex rel. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co. v. MannIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Baker v. PyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Carr v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. City of Logansport v. LaRoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. McFallIndiana Supreme Court · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API