Wilkinson v. Times Mirror Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STRANKMAN, J.
Article I, section 1 of the California Constitution declares that privacy is among the people’s “inalienable rights.” The principal question in this appeal is whether a private employer violates that constitutional provision by asking all job applicants to consent to a urinalysis which tests for alcohol and other drugs as a condition of an offer of employment. The applicants have notice of the drug testing policy, and the sample is collected during a regular preemployment physical examination conducted by medical personnel, under conditions designed to minimize the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- People v. MeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Hennessey v. Coastal Eagle Point Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Loder v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Ross v. RagingWire Telecommunications, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.