Pittsburgh Forgings Co. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
After considcraiton of this case we have decided to grant leave to the petitioners to apply to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for leave to file a complaint in the nature of a bill of review and for hearing, with directions to that court to take such action in the premises as may be required by law.
We say again, however, what we stated in the case of Raffold Process Corporation v. Castanea Paper Co., 3 Cir., 105 F.2d 126, 129, quoting with approval the opinion in Egry Register Co. v. Standard Register Co., 6 Cir., 1 F.2d 11, 12, viz., “The rule is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Egry Register Co. v. Standard Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Raffold Process Corp. v. Castanea Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wm. Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Federal Deposit Ins. v. AlkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Hottenstein v. York Ice Machinery Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Pangborn Corp. v. American Foundry Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946