Legal Opinion

Houdini Properties, LLC v. City of Romulus

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 2008No. 132018PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

743 N.W.2d 198 (2008)

HOUDINI PROPERTIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITY OF ROMULUS, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 132018. COA No. 266338.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 18, 2008.

On November 8, 2007, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and VACATE the Wayne Circuit Court's orders of October 19, 2005, granting summary disposition…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Adair v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Washington v. Sinai Hosp. of Greater DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Pearsall v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. MacEnas v. Village of MichianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dennis Dubuc v. Township of Green OakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. Get Back Up, Inc. v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  3. Karen Connell v. Lima TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Richard Zelasko v. Charter Township of BloomfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Richard Zelasko v. Charter Township of BloomfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API