Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Trbovich v. Trbovich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 2014No. Appeal No. 1Published

1ConcurrenceLindley, J.

Although I concur in the result reached by the majority, I write separately because I respectfully disagree with its conclusion that defendant is not entitled to a trial on the issue of whether the parties’ relationship has broken down irretrievably for a period of at least six months. Domestic Relations Law § 173 reads: “In an action for divorce there is a right to trial by jury of the issues of the grounds for granting the divorce.” One of the “grounds” for divorce in New York is that “[t]he relationship between husband and wife has broken down irretrievably for a period of at least six…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Pajak v. PajakNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Valladares v. ValladaresNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Excellus Health Plan, Inc. v. SerioNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Rinzler v. RinzlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API