Legal Opinion

Rinzler v. Rinzler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 2012PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stein, J.

In June 2009, plaintiff commenced an action for divorce on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment and abandonment (see Domestic Relations Law § 170 [1], [2]). Defendant answered and counterclaimed for spousal support arrears. In September 2010, after enactment of Domestic Relations Law § 170 (7)— which established a new ground for divorce based upon an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage (now referred to as no-fault divorce1) — plaintiff unsuccessfully sought defendant’s consent to discontinue the action, presumably so that he could commence a new action…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tucker v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Gleason v. GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Kent Development Co. v. LiccioneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Valladares v. ValladaresNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. DAIJ, Inc. v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Trbovich v. TrbovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Fulginiti v. FulginitiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Wells v. Town of LenoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. G.T. v. A.T.New York Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Jadron v. 10 Leonard Street, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API