Kowalske v. Armour and Company
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice. *
This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. Plaintiff, George W. Kowalske, was employed by Donovan Construction Company during the spring of 1966 in moving a high tension electric line which was located on a dike bordering the Mississippi River in order to permit another contractor to replace the dike. The line extended for about one mile along the Mississippi River. As a member of the work crew assigned to this project, plaintiff’s duties were to drive the crew that worked on the power…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mathews v. MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Marier v. Memorial Rescue Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Olson v. HartwigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Doyle v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. RidenourWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Ruberg v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- R.W. v. T.F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- R.A.P. v. B.J.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Rawson v. LohsenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.