Legal Opinion

Kowalske v. Armour and Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1974No. 44216PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice. *

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. Plaintiff, George W. Kowalske, was employed by Donovan Construction Company during the spring of 1966 in moving a high tension electric line which was located on a dike bordering the Mississippi River in order to permit another contractor to replace the dike. The line extended for about one mile along the Mississippi River. As a member of the work crew assigned to this project, plaintiff’s duties were to drive the crew that worked on the power…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mathews v. MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Marier v. Memorial Rescue Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Olson v. HartwigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Doyle v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. RidenourWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Ruberg v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. R.W. v. T.F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. R.A.P. v. B.J.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Rawson v. LohsenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API