Legal Opinion

Springfield Local Board of Education v. Summit County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1994No. 92-1511PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

The BTA analyzed the evidence before it and found the January 12, 1987 sale price of the Goodyear plant facilities was not the best indication of the value of the Subject property for tax year 1984. The BTA stated that in the absence of a current sale of property, true value in money may be determined by appraisal, utilizing the market approach to value, the income approach or the cost approach. We agree with this analysis.

The BTA noted the record included the auditor’s appraisal report presented at the board of revision hearing, and while no testimony was submitted to the BTA in support of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Alliance Towers, Ltd. v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Avon Lake City School District v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Board of Education v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. EOP-BP Tower, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Dayton-Montgomery County Port Authority v. Montgomery County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Columbus Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Amsdell v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Colonial Village Ltd. v. Washington County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API