Legal Opinion

Estate of Sayegh

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1953No. Civ. 19461PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

Executors of the estate of Gabriel N. Sayegh, deceased, are here appealing from a family allowance of $400 per month granted by the probate court to the respondent, decedent’s widow. The judgment and order also declared void a certain antenuptial agreement executed by respondent and decedent on February 18, 1952, the day of their marriage. The decedent died six days later, on February 24th. At the time of the marriage respondent, by profession an electrical engineer, was some 21 years younger than the decedent who was in poor health.

The antenuptial agreement in question reads as follows:

“Where…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Monk v. EhretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Estate of WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Streator v. LinscottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of HoltermannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Sayegh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Belmont v. BelmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Fernandez v. FernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Rivas v. AyalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API