Legal Opinion

Streator v. Linscott

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1908No. S.F. No. 4976PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This is an action brought by a resident and taxpayer of the city of Santa Cruz against the chairman of the board of supervisors and other officers of the county of Santa Cruz to enjoin them from signing or issuing certain bonds authorized by a vote of the electors of a school district embracing the city of Santa Cruz and certain outlying territory. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained and the plaintiff appeals from the ensuing judgment of dismissal.

The complaint sets forth the proceedings had for the purpose of authorizing the issuance of the bonds. It is not disputed that these…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Polly v. HopkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. McCoy v. BriantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Hopkins v. LovellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Building a Better Redondo, Inc. v. City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Carpenter v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  4. Board of Supervisors v. CothranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. California School Employees Ass'n v. Sequoia Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API