Legal Opinion

Sayegh v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1955No. L. A. 23726PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Louis P. Pink and J. Perry Langford for Real Parties in Interest.

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

Petitioner, the widow of Gabriel N. Sayegh, seeks a writ of prohibition to restrain respondent court from trying a petition to determine heirship in the estate of her deceased husband.

On February 18, 1952, petitioner entered into an ante-nuptial agreement with Mr. Sayegh which provided, among other things, that the survivor of them should have no interest in the property of the estate of the other by way of inheritance, succession, family allowance or homestead. They were married a few hours after the agreement was executed, and Mr. Sayegh died six days later, leaving a will dated February…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Rescue Army v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Baird v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Donovan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Goodman Bros. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Civil Service Employees Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Rogers v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Wheeler v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API