Legal Opinion

Vanlandingham v. Newberry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 12, 1924No. 14591PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error for the specific performance of a contract.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, plaintiff in error as plaintiff, and defendant in error as defendant.

The case was tried before the court without the intervention of a jury, and resulted in a judgment for the defendant.

Plaintiff filed his motion for a new trial, which was by the court overruled, and from which judgment and order of the court the plaintiff prosecutes his appeal to this court.

The assignments of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  2. Halsell v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  3. Rogers v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Young v. EllisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  5. Early v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crutchfield v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. McCubbins v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Chatterton v. LukerIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Palovik v. AbsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Bradshaw v. Superior Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API