Legal Opinion

Frick Co. v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1935No. 24279PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

The Frick Company sued Ruth R. Bridges and Don Bridges on certain promissory notes in the sum of $600 each. These notes represented the purchase-price of a certain engine sold under an express warranty contained in the order therefor signed by the defendants. The defendants admitted a prima facie case and set up as a defense that the engine was worthless and that the consideration for the notes had failed. By amendment the plaintiff attached to its petition the order for the machinery. This order was dated August 3, 1931, at Blakely, Georgia, and contained shipping directions to Fort Gaines,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. International Harvester Co. of America v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Belle City Manufacturing Co. v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Frick Company Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Wade v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  4. Frick Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API