Legal Opinion

International Harvester Co. of America v. Bowen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 12, 1915No. 5844PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Tifton — Judge B. Eve. June 1, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

1. While, under the decision in McDaniel v. Mallary Machinery Co., 6 Ga. App. 848 (66 S. E. 146), the jury might have been authorized to find that the written notice of defects as required by the contract was waived, it was error for the court to charge the jury, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff, as a result of the action of its agents in regard to the transaction, had waived its right to any written notice of defects from the defendant. This was a question for the jury.

2. If notice of defects had been given as required, or if, by the acts of the parties, it had been waived, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. Mallary Bros. Machinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. DillonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frick Co. v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Harrell v. International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. Singer Co. v. Gray & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API