Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 30, 1998No. CR 98-76PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

The appellant, David Andrew Thompson, entered a conditional guilty plea to the crimes of possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it denied Thompson’s motion to suppress evidence found during an inventory search of his car. Finding no error, we affirm.

On August 14, 1996, at approximately 10:00 p.m., Officer Walter stopped Thompson’s vehicle because the tail lights were not working. Officer Walter cited Thompson for not having a valid driver’s license or proof of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Travis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Snell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Frette v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Laime v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Dansby v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Flores v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Hoay v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API