Legal Opinion
Wiegand v. W. Bingham Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 18, 1939No. Nos. 7892, 7893PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The suit which led to the decree assailed by appeal and cross-appeal was for infringement of two patents granted to Wiegand for electrical heating elements, the first numbered 1,614,330, granted January 11, 1927, and the second, No. 1,614,-938, granted January 18, 1927, upon a divisional application for a heating element of the strip type. The plaintiffs were the inventor and his exclusive licensee. The suit was brought against a jobber in Cleveland, Ohio, but the manufacturer of the alleged infringing heater intervened and counter-claimed for infringement of Light-foot…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Maytag Co. v. Hurley MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Spalding v. John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- WM. B. Scaife & Sons Co. v. Falls City Woolen MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Wood v. Peerless Motor Car CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Thabet Manufacturing Company, D.B.A. American Beauty Ventilated Aluminum Awning Company v. Kool Vent Metal Awning Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Texas Co. v. Anderson-Prichard Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Cincinnati Milling MacHine Co. v. TurchanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Van Der Horst Corp. v. Chromium Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.