Legal Opinion
Van Der Horst Corp. v. Chromium Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 19, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, owner of patent No. 2,412,698 issued December 17, 1946 sues for infringement of claims 4, 6, 9, 13 and 22 to 27 of the patent. Hendrik van der Horst, President of the plaintiff corporation, is the inventor named in the patent and plaintiff’s assignor, and the patent states that the invention “relates to chromium wearing surfaces, i. e. surfaces subject to friction, and especially cylinder bores.”
Dr. van der Horst apparently has been working in the field of chromium surfaces, which are hard and therefore good wearing surfaces, for many years. He…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marcus Haliczer, D/B/A Noveltex Products Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Georgia-Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Vanderhorst Corporation of America v. Chromium Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Mastin v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.