Legal Opinion
Tuckey v. Harleysville Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 23, 1989PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
236 N.J. Super. 221 (1989)
565 A.2d 419
GEORGE R. TUCKEY AND NANCY M. TUCKEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE COMPANY, MIKE O'NEILL, CLAIMS REPRESENTATIVE AND SEA ISLE CITY, MICHAEL MCHALE, MAYOR, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 20, 1989.
Decided October 23, 1989.
Before Judges KING and KEEFE.
Nancy M. Tuckey appellant pro se, argued the cause for George R. and Nancy M. Tuckey.
Gerard W. Quinn argued the cause for the respondents (Cooper, Perskie, April, Niedelman, Wagenheim & Levenson, attorneys; Gerard W. Quinn, on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Anske v. Borough of Palisades ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
3Cited by15 opinions
- D.D. v. University of Medicine & DentistrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Cruz-Mendez v. ISU/Insurance ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- President v. JenkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Sinclair v. DunaganDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- County of Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.