Legal Opinion

Anske v. Borough of Palisades Park

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 19, 1976PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

139 N.J. Super. 342 (1976)

354 A.2d 87

PETER H. ANSKE AND CHRISTA ANSKE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

BOROUGH OF PALISADES PARK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted January 20, 1976.

Decided February 19, 1976.

Before Judges LYNCH, LARNER and HORN.

Mr. Robert C. Damm, attorney for appellants.

Messrs. Markey, Witham & Amabile, attorneys for respondent (Mr. Francis P. Witham on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HORN, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment entered against them in an action brought for personal injuries against defendant…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. West Jersey Title & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. McAndrew v. MularchukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Skulski v. NolanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. W v. Pangborne & Co. v. New Jersey Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. D.D. v. University of Medicine & DentistrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Coghill v. BadgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Kenney v. Scientific, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  5. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API