Whittlesea v. Farmer
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*348OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
The central issue presented by this appeal is whether a covenant not to execute falls within the provisions of the Uniform Obligations Act. We hold that it does not.
Farmer commenced an action against Whittlesea, his employee Fry, the Nevada Bank of Commerce and its employee *349Lamb to recover damages for personal injuries incurred while riding as a passenger in a Whittlesea taxi driven by Fry which collided with a car driven by Lamb. Fry and Lamb were charged jointly and severally as tortfeasors. The liability of their respective employers was premised on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pellett v. Sonotone Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Hansen v. CollettNevada Supreme Court · 1963
- Pacific States Lumber Co. v. BargarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Land v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1964
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bishop v. KLEIN FULLERMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Breitkreutz v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. BlomfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- McCurry v. School District of ValleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Van Cleave v. Gamboni Construction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.