Legal Opinion

Pacific States Lumber Co. v. Bargar

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 18, 1926No. 4686PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCAMANT, Circuit Judge.

Defendant claims that plaintiff neither alleged nor proved a cause of action under the Employers’ Liability Statute, It appeared that at the time plaintiff was injured he was employed by Coos Bay Stevedoring Company. This corporation was loading on the steamship De Perre a cargo of lumber supplied by the defendant. The vessel was moored at the defendant’s dock, and the defendant was delivering the lumber within reach of the ship’s gear. The lumber was delivered in small four-wheel ears hauled from the mill on tracks by horses. The cargo was being stowed in several' of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Matheson v. O'KaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Turnidge v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Warner v. SynnesOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Clayton v. Enterprise Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  2. Western Express Co. v. SmeltzerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  3. Whittlesea v. FarmerNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Gamble v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
  5. Conqueror Trust Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API